Jim Giles interviewed me a couple of days ago on Radio Free Mississippi.  The primary territory is the conflict between Jewish interests and the Enlightenment values of truth and freedom—conflict as exemplified by the hostility of Jews toward the laboratory of the states to found discourse on experimentation rather than argumentation.  It is 1 hour 48 minutes.

It is available in Majority Radio as well as Radio Free Mississippi.

The Linder interview, which took place on Tuesday afternoon, is now on the Radio Page.  It is long, having been closely edited as such so it would make a single podcast, and I hope quite stimulating.

I’m pleased to see that Alex has answered a couple of questions on the earlier thread, which I did not raise with him in our conversation.

I’ve written enough about political economy here in the past to provide those interested with some background for what is to follow:  A political platform alternative to the citizen’s dividend that rides the current discontent by State governments in the US to directly devolve Federal programs to the States via a populist takeover of the House of Representatives.

READ MORE...

Tomorrow morning Central Time I’ll be interviewing Alex Linder.  The shape of the discussion is pretty well set, but I would be interested to know if readers have their own questions they would like to see asked.

If such questions differ from what I already have planned, and providing they are productive, of course, I’ll find some time to ask them.

The three hundred or more delegates to the BNP Conference in Wigan have voted overwhelmingly to commit the party to the leadership’s policy of remaining within the law, remaining a party able to fight elections, and admitting non-whites to membership.  Nick Griffin’s own amendments were accepted.  It is thought this means that sub-groups will be formed to house the non-white applicants.

Does the membership change mean that the party has lost its fourteen-word soul?  Or is it merely a cosmetic and inevitable stratagem to satisfy the requirements of British law?  Or is it, in fact, a golden opportunity for the party to advance its cause by the very laws that the Establishment has used to persecute it?

Here’s Lee Barnes with the upside:

The issue is ... where now for the ‘anti-fascists’ ?

For the general public, who believe their lies, the constant scream of ‘racists’ and ‘nazis’ is the primary weapon in the arsenal of the anti-BNP coalition. But that weapon is now rendered defunct. They cannot call the BNP ‘racist’ anymore as we will have many non-white members joining. They can’t call the BNP ‘nazi’ anymore as our new non-white members are obviously not nazis. They can’t call the BNP ‘racist’ anymore either as non-whites will be joining. Therefore the whole tactics and strategy of the Far Left and the media has to change - but how ?

They haven’t got a clue.

Lee goes on to claim that the membership change is “a political revolution”:

READ MORE...

I’ve been mailed links to two resources by different readers.  Each resource has high research value, and I thought your attention should be drawn to them.

The first is the authoritative source for anyone who wants to examine the spoken parliamentary record - like, for example, when the post-war Labour government first decided to invite Jamaican immigrants into our midst.  This, of course, is Hansard and is:

generated from information from Hansard, the Official Report of debates in Parliament.  Information presented here is generated from the publicly available XML files ...  There’s Hansard itself; by volume, just the Lords sittings, Commons sittings or Westminster Hall sittings. You can also view Written Answers, Written Statements, Lords reports or Grand Committee reports.

We also have extracted lists of People who are recorded as having spoken, Constituencies, Offices, Acts, Bills and Divisions. You can also see information about the Source files containing the original XML and the Data files we generate from them.

I am indebted to JB for the link.

The second link is for something quite different but no less useful, and it is to “perhaps the most comprehensive biomedical site on the net”, according to the reader, James, who sent it:

BioMedSearch is an enhanced version of the NIH PubMed search that combines MedLine/PubMed data with data from other sources to make the most comprehensive biomedical literature search available. BioMedSearch also provides advanced account features that allow saved searches, alerts, saving documents to portfolios, commenting on documents and portfolios, and sharing documents with other registered users. Registering for BioMedSearch is free.

MR readers are a useful lot, I’m pleased to say.

Soren and I have decided to re-open the Radio Project - that’s ours, not Mr Rockefeller’s.  Initially, at least, the interviewing is likely to be done by me.  Soren gamely agreed to be my first victim.  The result is a long and, I think, pretty interesting investigation of Soren’s political development.

There was a microphone issue at the Chicago end of the operation, and the stereo reflects that at the moment.  If we can re-process the recording and eliminate that we will do so.

The button on the sidebar will take you to the Radio Page.